More Sloppy Work (27/01/15)
Paragraph 2.6
"..., pay model NLC5 was more attractive as a long-term workable structure and one which appear (s)to offer competitive salaries,..."
Paragraph 2.7
Quite incredibly Paragraph 2.7 which comes after Paragraph 2.6 is numbered 2.5 - can this possibly mean that the document has been interfered with in some way?
Paragraph 6.8
"This should reduce the cost currently associated with the trainee technician's in the department."
Paragraph 6.8
"This should reduce the cost currently associated with the trainee technician's in the department."
Now I was always taught that if you take great pride and care over all the little things, then the big things tend to take care of themselves.
But this kind of slapdash approach to what was a hugely significant report to the Council's Corporate Management Team suggests there is an awful lot more still to come out.
I mean, honestly, how is it possible for a major report to the Council's most senior managers to contain such a whopper of a mistake as having two Paragraphs with the same numbering (2.5)?
If you ask me, it makes North Lanarkshire Council look like the local government equivalent of the once famous 'Keystone Cops'.
I mean, honestly, how is it possible for a major report to the Council's most senior managers to contain such a whopper of a mistake as having two Paragraphs with the same numbering (2.5)?
If you ask me, it makes North Lanarkshire Council look like the local government equivalent of the once famous 'Keystone Cops'.
