Labour Losers



One of the remarkable things about the Labour Party is that its two most recent UK and Scottish leaders, Ed Miliband and Johann Lamont, both lost the popular vote amongst individual party members.

But because of Labour's undemocratic electoral college system which gives unions bosses the ability to influence the process, both Ed and Johann were declared winners even though this must have looked completely crazy to Labour Party members never mind the ordinary man or woman in the street.

Because what business is it of the trade unions to decide who should be the Scottish or UK Labour leader?

None at all if you ask me and Ed Miliband seems to agree because he has since changed the rules to ensure this doesn't happen again, except that he didn't do so in time for the forthcoming election in Scotland.

So Labour's ridiculous electoral college will be rolled out one more time to decide who will succeed Johann Lamont.    

Labour Loser Wins Again (18 December 2014)















The new leader of the Scottish Labour party - Johann Lamont - has not been elected by individual Labour party members.


In the individual member section of Labour's barmy electoral college - the votes cast were as follows:

Tom Harris - 3.444%
Johann Lamont - 12.183%
Ken Macintosh - 17.707%

Total - 33.33%

Now the reason that the total adds up to 33.33% instead of 100% - is that party members have only one-third of the votes - which sounds completely bonkers because it is completely bonkers.

But in most other political parties this would have produced the following result:

Tom Harris - 10%
Joahann Lamont - 37%
Ken Macintosh - 53%

Total - 100%

So Ken Macintosh won an overall majority in the ballot of individual Labour party members in Scotland - of whom there are less than 20,000 these days.

And no wonder because they don't even get to elect their own leader.

In the Alice in Wonderland world of the Labour party two more sections of the 'electoral college' come into play - one for parliamentarians (MSPs and MPs) and the other for trade unions.

So out of the total number of ballot papers sent out - well over 300,000 according to Labour - less than 20,000 are for individual Labour party members - 100 or so are for MSPs and MPs - and around 300,000 are for non-Labour party members in the trade unions.

Which means that 20,000 votes - has the same value as 100 votes - has the same value as 300,000 votes - or to put it plainly some votes in the Labour party are much more equal than others.

Not everyone votes of course which distorts the picture even further - but the turnout figures have still to be released for each section - and will make interesting reading at some point.

Ironically, Labour's new deputy leader in Scotland - Anas Sarwar - has been elected by ordinary party members who voted for him by a majority of 61% - despite a trade union campaign to elect one of his rivals.

So Scottish Labour has ended up in exactly the same position as the UK Labour party - they have a new leader - but one who has been rejected by ordinary party members. 

Popular posts from this blog

SNP - Conspiracy of Silence

LGB Rights - Hijacked By Intolerant Zealots!