Good Idea
What a good idea, I have to say, even if it's bound to ruffle a few diplomatic feathers.
Because why should the Saudis have a veto over who should or should not drive the President's car?
Amnesty has asked President Obama to raise the treatment of women with his Saudi hosts, pointing out that discrimination is entrenched on many levels:
“Under its restrictive guardianship system, women need the permission of a male guardian to get married, travel, undergo certain types of surgery, accept paid employment or enrol in higher education,” Amnesty said.
Amnesty has asked President Obama to raise the treatment of women with his Saudi hosts, pointing out that discrimination is entrenched on many levels:
“Under its restrictive guardianship system, women need the permission of a male guardian to get married, travel, undergo certain types of surgery, accept paid employment or enrol in higher education,” Amnesty said.
And very well said, if you ask me.
Hairy v Wary Bikers (4 January 2014)
The nearest thing we have in the UK to Wary Bikers are the Hairy Bikers - David Myers and Simon King - the two celebrated TV chefs from the north east of England, but I don't suppose they need to be escorted and chaperoned wherever they go, being men.
Allah be praised!
A miraculous event has occurred in Saudi Arabia where religious authorities have seen the light - to an extent at least - and granted women the right to ride bicycles for the very first time.
Now this new 'freedom' is not without practical problems because - at the same time - the same religious authorities have decreed that women riding bikes in Saudi Arabia must be conservatively dressed at all times.
Which means wearing a long black cloak similar to the burka being - and woe betide anyone who disobeys the rules - which are many and bewildering in equal measure.
Not only does the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice (CPVPV) lay down a dress code for women cyclists - the CPVPV states that cycling is only permitted in parks, beach fronts and deserted rural areas.
The reason for such precautions, according to a CPVPV spokesman, is that - “Women wishing to drive motorbikes and bicycles should choose places where there are no gatherings of young men to harass them or steal their belongings.”
But it doesn't stop there because women must be accompanied by a male guardian “in case of falls or accidents” - who can presumably also double up as a minder, if there are groups of potential thieves or harassers in the area.
Now whether this new, much qualified, right to cycle should be seen a breakthrough depends on your point of view - but one Saudi woman reacted on Twitter with the wry comment:
“Great. We have been granted the same rights as children.”
But the fight for women's rights continues and will focus soon on Saudi Arabia's ban on women driving cars - the only country in the world to operate such a policy.
The existing ban is due to be debated live on TV by the kingdom’s top advisory body - the Shura Council - which can recommend to the monarchy that the ban be overturned.
For the first time ever Saudi women will take an active part in the debate - following King Abdullah’s decision to appoint 30 women to the 150-member Shura Council - which had previously been an all-male affair.
So let see what happens - should be an interesting discussion.
Wary Bikers (6 April 2013)
Allah be praised!
A miraculous event has occurred in Saudi Arabia where religious authorities have seen the light - to an extent at least - and granted women the right to ride bicycles for the very first time.
Now this new 'freedom' is not without practical problems because - at the same time - the same religious authorities have decreed that women riding bikes in Saudi Arabia must be conservatively dressed at all times.
Which means wearing a long black cloak similar to the burka being - and woe betide anyone who disobeys the rules - which are many and bewildering in equal measure.
Not only does the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice (CPVPV) lay down a dress code for women cyclists - the CPVPV states that cycling is only permitted in parks, beach fronts and deserted rural areas.
The reason for such precautions, according to a CPVPV spokesman, is that - “Women wishing to drive motorbikes and bicycles should choose places where there are no gatherings of young men to harass them or steal their belongings.”
But it doesn't stop there because women must be accompanied by a male guardian “in case of falls or accidents” - who can presumably also double up as a minder, if there are groups of potential thieves or harassers in the area.
Now whether this new, much qualified, right to cycle should be seen a breakthrough depends on your point of view - but one Saudi woman reacted on Twitter with the wry comment:
“Great. We have been granted the same rights as children.”
But the fight for women's rights continues and will focus soon on Saudi Arabia's ban on women driving cars - the only country in the world to operate such a policy.
The existing ban is due to be debated live on TV by the kingdom’s top advisory body - the Shura Council - which can recommend to the monarchy that the ban be overturned.
For the first time ever Saudi women will take an active part in the debate - following King Abdullah’s decision to appoint 30 women to the 150-member Shura Council - which had previously been an all-male affair.
So let see what happens - should be an interesting discussion.
Women Drivers (28 December 2013)
I see that the Labour Party is finally waking up to the fact that women train drivers in the UK are about as rare as hen's teeth.
Now I've been writing about this scandal for a long time and here are some article from the blog site archive to prove my point, but you've got to ask where has the People's Party been all this time - and what does Labour have to say about the role played by one of its affiliated trade unions, ASLEF?
In any event here's an article from the Independent newspaper which I enjoyed although to be honest blaming Thomas the Tank engine for the lack of positive action within the industry to recruit women drivers - seems more than a little lame, i you ask me.
By ANTONIA MOLLOY
Thomas the Tank Engine is sending out the wrong message to children and needs more female engines to encourage girls to become train drivers, Labour’s shadow transport secretary has said.
Mary Creagh said the lack of female train drivers in Britain was a “national scandal” and that the “negative stereotypes” seen in children’s shows were partly to blame.
Mrs Creagh used the example of Thomas, saying that while the books and television show are “wonderful”, they contain hardly any female characters.
“In the Thomas the Tank Engine books there are almost no female engines. The only female characters are an annoyance, a nuisance and in some cases a danger to the functioning of the railway,” she said.
She was referring to the original books’ only female characters: coaches Annie and Clarabel, Isabel the auto coach, elderly woman Mrs Kyndley, and female engine Daisy.
Thomas and the remaining characters are all male.
Train drivers' union Aslef is currently working to encourage more women into the industry, where only 4.2 per cent of workers are female - equating to 1,000 train drivers.
Mrs Creagh suggested train companies could recruit more female drivers by advertising in magazines such as Good Housekeeping and Women’s Own and by offering more flexible, part-time work.
According to the Telegraph, the mother-of-two said: ”There is a preponderance of men in the transport industry and I am very keen to unpack some of the myths that stop women from taking up what are often highly paid and highly skilled jobs.“
Shadow Transport Secretary Mary Creagh
There are now 42 book in the Thomas the Tank Engine series, which was created in 1946 by the Reverend Wilbert Awdry. The TV show has been running since 1984 and is currently broadcast by Channel 5.
Mrs Creagh drew unfavourable comparisons with the CBeebies series Underground Ernie, which features a train called Victoria as its main character.
Hit Entertainment, the company which owns the rights to Thomas & Friends, admitted there was a ”historical imbalance“, but said more female engines are "in development."
Mrs Creagh drew unfavourable comparisons with the CBeebies series Underground Ernie, which features a train called Victoria as its main character.
Hit Entertainment, the company which owns the rights to Thomas & Friends, admitted there was a ”historical imbalance“, but said more female engines are "in development."
Women Drivers (27 December 2011)
I decided to have another look at the position of women members in the train drivers trade union ASLEF - see post dated December 26th 2011 - 'Song Remains the Same'.
Now almost ten years on from my original article - for one of the Sunday newspapers - there has been some progress - of sorts you could say.
But the pace of change is embarrassingly slow - things are moving along at a snail's pace - rather than the speed of a sleek high-speed train.
Because in 2002 the figures recorded by the TUC for ASLEF showed:
ASLEF 2002
Total members - 15,553
Men - 15,180 (97.6%)
Women - 373 (2.4%)
But almost ten years on the latest TUC figures now show:
ASLEF 2011
Total members - 18,532
Men - 17,866 (96.3%)
Women - 666 (3.7%)
So while the percentage of women members in 2002 was a lowly 2.4% - almost 10 years later it 'climbed' to an underwhelming 3.7%.
In that decade ASLEF's women membership rose by 293 (from 373 to 666) - yet the number of men in the union also increased - by 2,686 (from 15,180 to 17,866).
Of the total increase in ASLEF's membership - 2979 (from 15,553 to 18,532) - 9.8% were women (293) while 91.2% were men.
Now this is not a complete picture of course - because not every worker is necessarily a member of the trade union, ASLEF.
But what it does tell you is that there is something far wrong with the recruitment practices in the rail industry - because these are some of the best paid jobs in the country - yet women drivers are about as rare as hen's teeth.
If the rail industry has been trying to achieve a better balanced workforce over the past 10 years - trying to attract more women - then it has failed miserably.
And so has ASLEF it has to be said - because there are lots of women out there doing very demanding and responsible jobs - who would gladly drive a train for a salary worth around £50,000 a year.
No doubt the employers and the trade unions will say that they are both fully committed to equality issues and equal opportunities in the rail industry.
But if that's the case then how come 9 men have been recruited for every woman - over the past ten years?
The answer is that a 'hidden hand' is at work - one that is keeping women out of this highly unionised and well-paid workforce.
And that is something about which both the employers and the trade unions - should be deeply ashamed.
Song Remains the Same (26 December 2011)
The dispute is apparently about working on public holidays such as Boxing Day - with ASLEF demanding that their members should be paid triple time - plus an extra day in lieu.
Quite what the logic of this demand is I don't know - because no other public service industry in the land pays such high rates - as far as I know anyway.
So what makes train or tube drivers so special - because a nurse or a carer doesn't get triple time and a day in lieu?
Nothing is the answer, but for years the rail unions have used their bargaining position to drive up pay and conditions - for jobs that don't hold a candle to many other demanding jobs in the public sector.
The London underground drivers are paid salaries worth almost £50,000 a year - much more than a highly qualified nurse running an intensive care unit, for example.
But the drivers willingness to go on strike regularly has driven wages up to levels that are in no way justified - in terms of the skill and responsibility of their jobs.
Successive governments have lacked the will to bring forward proposals to require compulsory arbitration in damaging disputes like these - which is really what's required.
Here's something I wrote about ASLEF for one of the Sunday newspapers, almost 10 years ago now, I don't think much has changed beyond the fact that the union has a new general sercretary.
In essence the song remains the same.
What does ASLEF stand for?
Mick Rix is the top banana in the train drivers union, ASLEF; a tough-minded negotiator by all accounts, which is fair enough because that’s what he’s paid to do by his 15,553 members. But don’t be fooled into believing that the current rash of rail disputes is about some noble cause. Oh no, this is free market economics, red in tooth and claw, and Aslef is the trade union movement’s answer to David Beckham, only much less modern in its outlook.
Railway drivers are an elite group. While other trade unions have merged to create industry wide bargaining, ASLEF remains resolutely on its own, which makes sense from a narrow self-interest point of view since becoming part of a bigger bargaining group would dilute the drivers’ negotiating strength. So, ASLEF members pay some of the highest union contribution rates in the land, £17.77 a month, as the price of maintaining their independence.
Elsewhere, trade union have put aside old differences and looked to the future: Cohse, Nalgo and Nupe merged to form Unison, AEU and MSF tied the knot recently to re-emerge as Amicus, and the GMB and TGWU are engaged in a long courtship to create another new super union, which cynics predict will be called the G&T- union barons are part of the establishment nowadays, by and large, the class warriors are long gone.
Transport unions have also gone down this path. The NUR and NUS gave birth to the RMT some years ago, but Aslef won’t touch it with a bargepole as long as the good times continue to roll. Mick Rix called for national bargaining recently as the way to bring peace to a troubled industry, though he means bargaining in separate groups, not industry wide, so that train drivers can continue to hold employers and commuters to ransom. Of course, national bargaining is no answer at all if it simply ratchets up pay levels, regardless of productivity or the employer’s ability to pay, since unsustainably high fares will be the result.
Yet drivers are not amongst the ranks of the low paid-not by a long chalk! A driver’s job carries responsibility for public safety, admittedly, but involves relatively little training or skill compared to a nurse, for example. So, why are rail drivers paid more than twice as much as a newly qualified staff nurse who has studied for a minimum of three years?
The answer lies in poor management and lack of political leadership resulting in an industry that’s a terrible mess, as everyone knows. Successive governments have ducked long-term investment decisions and the public is now paying the price, but the culture of the railways needs a radical shake-up as well.
Incredibly, ASLEF can boast of only 373 women amongst the ranks of its members according to the TUC’ s web site. 2.4% explains a lot about the culture inside the union and since ASLEF operates pretty much as a closed shop, it also paints an accurate picture of the wider industry; backward looking, a stranger to equal opportunities and the notion that women might have the skills necessary to drive a train. Spelling out the union’s acronym sums things up rather neatly: ASLEF is the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen. What’s in a name? Quite a lot if you think about it.
Performance wise, there’s a good case for tying senior rail executives to their own tracks for allowing macho industrial relations to develop such a strong hold. ASLEF is merely exploiting the situation for all it’s worth, going back to the movement’s historical roots with a dose of old-fashioned trade union syndicalism. Issues of low pay elsewhere in the industry, within the RMT for example, are unimportant and the public interest barely registers on the union’s radar screen. It’s a dog eat dog world out there and no one is going to look at the world from the point of view of the long suffering, fare paying passenger.
So, these strikes are not about low pay, rapacious employers, or attacks on trade union rights and members interests. Instead, they’re about ASLEF exploiting a bargaining position that’s been reinforced by breathtaking incompetence from senior managers. Appealing to common sense or reason won’t make a blind bit of difference at this stage, hard-nosed thinking and a commitment to change is the only answer.
In a rational world, the government would move quickly to restore order to the present chaos. A modern public transport system will never be achieved with industrial relations that belong to the 19th century. Why invest billions if managers try to operate services by relying on drivers to work overtime, which is asking for trouble?
Big reforms are possible without attacking drivers or union rights. Compulsory arbitration ought to be high on Stephen Byers agenda as he fights for his political career and comes up with a cunning plan to get Labour off the ropes ahead of the next election.
Scotland’s first minister, Jack McConnell, got it right by describing industrial relations in the railways as ‘shocking’ in the 21st century, but government needs a strategy not just angry words.
Mark A. Irvine
January 2002
